This page is for nominations and discussion of users to obtain user rights.
- Instructions
- Users will never be given any rights against their will. As a result, make sure the user you would like to nominate for a right knows about your intentions and is interested in the right in question!
Click the "Edit" button next to the right you would like to nominate a user for, then create a level three heading which contains the name of the user you would like to nominate.
- Example: ===[[User:Example|Example]]===
When the above is done, copy the following code below the header you created in the above step:
====Support==== #'''...''' ====Oppose==== #'''...''' ====Neutral/Recuse==== #'''...''' ====Comments==== *...
It is common (but not required) that the nominator pre-fill the first point under the "Support" section with their reasoning for making the nomination/why they believe the nominee would do well in the role they were nominated for.
Bureaucrats[]
| Summary |
|---|
| Bureaucrats are particularly trusted admins who have the extra capability to manage user rights. Bureaucrats are also responsible for resolving admin disputes. New bureaucrats may be nominated in this section. |
- For previous discussions, see the archive
Please make sure you understand what makes a good candidate for this right before nominating a user here. For convenience, a basic summary of this wiki's bureaucrat policy is provided to the right.
Administrators[]
| Summary |
|---|
| Administrators are to serve leadership and maintenance roles on the wiki, and are to act in the best interests of the community. Despite their extra permissions, admins do not outrank other users. New administrators may be nominated in this section. |
- For previous discussions, see the archive
Please make sure you understand what makes a good candidate for this right before nominating a user here. For convenience, a basic summary of this wiki's admin policy is provided to the right.
Squazzil[]
- Closing statement
- The nomination has been closed with overwhelming support. Congratulations to Squazzil on becoming an admin!
iPathos | Talk Page | Tue 23 February 2016, 14:00
Support[]
Support -After discussion with one of the Wiki's semi-inactive Administrators, we've come to the agreement that the wiki is in need of another active admin. After both discussion and looking over various candidates, none stand out more so than Squazzil. While I give this nomination a good length of time to reach a proper consensus, I will be trialing Squazzil as a Rollbacker. She has performed consistently well in her role as a Chat Moderator and Forum Moderator since being given the rights in February 2014 and March 2015 respectively. She has shown reliable judgment and a very good community-management skills, something that is of great value in an editor and admin alike. Her edits are of consistent high quality and I believe she would benefit from having the extra rights available to her. iPathos | Talk Page | Tue 2 February 2016, 23:48- Support - My vote may be a bit of a joke here, as I'm hardly active here (and, most of you guys don't know me,) however, I have always seen Squazzil in chat. Furthermore, I'm quite sure this wiki needs another active Administrator. And, Squazzil has (imo) the knowledge to be a very good editor, and a very good Admin. PS: Sorry for such a poorly written vote -- I want to get back to editing at TES atm :P The_CrusaderTalkpage05:21:37_February 03, 2016
- Support - I do not see a reason to say no here, as Squazzil is a very active contrubitor of this wiki since December 2011. She has more than 3000 edits. I see her in chat everyday, so I can say she is very friendly and mature. Every single admin here is inactive, except for Path, and he needs an admin besides him. I believe Squazzil could make the best admin out of every active user here, so I think she should be an administrator.
Terrr - Talk 17:41, February 3, 2016 (UTC) - Support -Me too! My Templates will not work for a bit, But I vote for Squazzil because she is an awesome, nice, epic, busy, and overall funny person. This wiki needs another active Admin so Squazzil will definately make do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AEG:Terraria Lover (talk • contribs). Please sign talk page posts with
~~~~(4 tildes). - Support -I think she's a good contributor and quite friendly, helps give tips on where to post things if it's not in the right space or the user made a mistake, plus she's cool to talk to in chat, so why not? Duke Feeshron (talk) 19:15, February 3, 2016 (GMT)
- Support -I believe Squazzil will make a good admin. She's an active editor, not only on the mainspace but also on the boards, and also a good Chat Moderator. She's a big help throughout the wiki and it's been that way for a long time (I've heard she was like that even before I became active on this wiki). She's one of the most mature people I've met on wikia and she knows how to deal with local conflict. I believe as a person with experience as extensive as hers, she will easily learn what is needed to be a good sysop once she's promoted to the position. ⛧ RenzXVI // Talk // Chat // 19:58, February 3, 2016 (UTC)
- Support - I'm happy to see that this got put up. As I said previously, Squazzil is a dedicated and mature user that would fit the role nicely. The wiki needs another administrator in light of Path essentially being the only fully active user with sysop abilities on the wiki. I believe that she is the best candidate for this position on the wiki currently. (✿◕‿◕)~♥ Swaggins ~ (The Terrarian Bugle) ~ (Talk) ♥~(◕‿◕✿) ~ 22:25, February 3, 2016 (UTC)
Oppose[]
- ...
Neutral/Recuse[]
- ...
Comments[]
- ...
Rollbackers[]
| Summary |
|---|
| Rollback is a tool which allows for multiple consecutive edits by the same editor to be reverted in a single click. Users who possess this right on this wiki are identified by green usernames. Users can be nominated for this role in this section. |
- For previous discussions, see the archive
Please make sure you understand what makes a good candidate for this right before nominating a user here. For convenience, a basic summary of this wiki's rollback policy is provided to the right.
Forum Moderators[]
| Summary |
|---|
| Forum moderators are users who have several additional abilities for use in the forums. Users with this right are responsible for maintenance and moderation on the forums, though they do not have the ability to restrict users from accessing the forums. Users may be nominated for this right in this section |
- For previous discussions, see the archive
Please make sure you understand what makes a good candidate for this right before nominating a user here. For convenience, a basic summary of this wiki's forum moderator guidelines is provided to the right.